The
Hon'ble Apex Court clearly made it clear that the builder has no power to sell
any car parking by receiving consideration amount from the customer because of
the said area would be treated as common area.
It was argued in Supreme Court Civil Appeal
No. 2544 OF 2010 Nahalchand Laloochand Pvt. Ltd. Versus Panchali Co-operative
Housing Society Ltd. that the right of the promoter to dispose of the stilt
parking space is a matter falling within the domain of the promoter's
contractual, legal and fundamental right and such right is not affected. This
argument is founded on the premise, firstly, that stilt parking space is a
`flat' by itself within the meaning of Section 2(a-1) of MOFA and in the
alternative that it is not part of `common areas'. But we have already held
that `stilt parking space' is not covered by the term `garage' much less a
`flat' and that it is part of `common areas'. it must be held that stilt
parking space/s being part of `common areas' of the building developed by the
promoter, the only right that the promoter has, is to charge the cost thereof
in proportion to the carpet area of the flat from each flat purchaser. Such
stilt parking space being neither `flat' under Section 2(a-1) nor `garage'
within the meaning of that provision is not sellable at all.
It is, thus, clear that the promoter has no
right to sell `stilt parking spaces' as these are neither `flat' nor
appurtenant or attachment to a `flat'.
No comments:
Post a Comment